August, 2002 Electrostatic spray
technology proves itself on rice
by Dr. Joseph P. Krausz
Extension Plant Pathologist
Dr. Joseph P. Krausz Professor, Extension Program Leader for Plant Pathology
and Associate Department Head, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A
& M University, and Dr. J. B. Carlton, retired USDA-ARS agricultural engineer, and
inventor or the Spectrum electrostatic aerial system.

Electrostatic spay technology has been shown to improve significantly spray deposition on
the top and bottom surfaces of leaves, reduce drift and run-off, reduce the quantity of
water needed, and in some cases reduce the pesticide required to do the job. Electrostatic
spray technology has been used successfully for years in improving insect control and
defoliation in cotton. Dr.
J.B. Carlton and associates with the USDA-ARS in College Station, TX,
developed the technology which is now being used effectively by Speck Thornton, owner of Independent Dusting Service, Inc. in El
Campo to apply herbicides, insecticides and defoliants to over 100,000 acres of cotton and
rice.
How does it work? An electrode surrounds each nozzle and induces a static electric charge
to the spray droplets as they emerge from the nozzle. The electrostatically charged spray
droplets are attracted to the surfaces of leaf tissue. This results is much improved, more
uniform coverage of the foliage. Spray volumes can be reduced from the conventional
10-gallon per acre or 5-gallon per acre rates to as low as 1- or 2-gallons per acre with
the electrostatic system. On June 6, I participated in a field demonstration in Wharton
county where a spray dye was applied aerially to a rice crop at about the 2- to 4- inch
particle stage with a conventional spray rig at 10 gallons and 5 gallons per acre, and
with the electrostatic system at only one gallon per acre. I was impressed by the apparent
improved, more uniform coverage of the rice foliage on both surfaces of the leaves with
the electrostatic spray system. It would be interesting to see if this improved coverage
resulted in improved sheath blight control. It should be at least as effective as the
conventional 10-gallon application with similar quantity of
fungicide.
Even if disease control is similar between the two application methods, savings in the
cost of application can be passed on to the farmer, since application efficiency is much
improved and the pilot can spray many more acres with less re-loading. This new technology
could be very useful in rice production.
Demonstration attendees are evaluating spray
coverage using handheld UV lighting.
Deborah Freeman
AgAir Update
P.O. Box 850, Perry, GA 31069
aau@agairupdate.com
www.agairupdate.com
Tel: 478-987-2250
Fax: 888-382-6951 or int'l 478-987-1836